Humble servant of the Nation

Smoke and mirrors: The big money behind Australia’s vaping ban

SHARE
, / 8872 114

With a new financial year underway, the Morrison government will request the Governor-General to prohibit the importation of e-cigarettes containing vaporiser nicotine and nicotine-containing refills for e-cigarettes unless on prescription from a doctor.

The G-G can hardly say no.

As of next Wednesday, importing nicotine as a liquid for vaping or in the form of e-cigarettes in one shape or another will be criminalised. It comes with a $220,000 fine.

Even if you ordered a supply of nicotine last week, it will be seized. Force majeur. No refunds payable.

Evan Mullholland, the Director of Communications at the Institute of Public Affairs tweeted yesterday, “I don’t smoke, but I know so many people who have kicked the habit of cigarettes by vaping. It is clearly a safer alternative. Greg Hunt is a decent Minister but as a Liberal Party member of over 10 years I have to say this is the most abhorrent decision I have seen in politics.”

Forget smokers. It’s the Commonwealth that has become gormlessly addicted to nicotine. Australian cigarettes are the most expensive in the world. A pack of 25 cigarettes at the bottom end costs around $32 or $1.25 a stick. Around 80 cents of that is kicked over to the Commonwealth.

The Commonwealth pocketed $12.15bn in tobacco excise last year. Budget estimates for the next financial year put the excise grab at $16.9bn and it is projected to stay around $16bn over the forward estimates.

That’s a lot of money. To give it a sense of scale it is just $6bn shy of total Commonwealth spending on Medicare and roughly a quarter of the Commonwealth health budget, paid by one eighth of the population.

A man exhaling smoke from an electronic cigarette. Picture: Eva Hambach/AFP
A man exhaling smoke from an electronic cigarette. Picture: Eva Hambach/AFP

Vaping is much cheaper than smoking, not least of all because those who have legitimately imported nicotine products pay no excise to the Commonwealth. It’s a matter of ordering online and paying for the goods, the postage and handling and paying whatever tax is in place in the country they are purchasing from.

The way the law is at present, it is illegal to sell nicotine in liquid form or e-cigarettes in every state and territory.

Vapers have had to turn to the internet and lawfully purchase those products from overseas, often from New Zealand or the United States.

Minister Hunt says that a vaper may continue to import nicotine provided they have a prescription from their GP, approval from the Health Department and have successfully applied for permits to import the product.

There are so many hoops to clamber through, even the most stubborn vapers will give up.

Smoking rates have reduced, but only marginally in the last three years, down from 12.8 per cent of the population 14 or older to 12.2 per cent. Much of that reduction comes from a sharp decline in smoking among the 15-24 age. The plain packaging advocates argue that it is a consequence of their policy but it is impossible to separate the implementation of plain packaging from the sharp, twice annual rises in excise and the rise of vaping.

We have very little data on vapers or users of e-cigarettes. That in itself is a poor reflection on health administrators in this country.

It is estimated there are around 300,000 vapers in the country. What we can only guess at is whether that number also smoke cigarettes, whether they vape as a means to an end of quitting smoking or whether they vape for the simple pleasure of inhaling nicotine and have no intention of quitting.

Similarly, there is very little data on the long-term harm that may come from vaping but a rule of thumb figure is smoking is around twenty times more dangerous. This is supported by the Royal College of Physicians in the UK which concluded, “the hazard to health arising from long-term vapour inhalation from the e-cigarettes available today is unlikely to exceed five per cent of the harm from smoking tobacco.”

Unlike vaping, smoking cigarettes includes the inhalation of known carcinogens in tar like butadiene, benzene, aldehydes, and ethylene oxide.

There is no evidence to indicate inhaling second-hand steam (rather than smoke) causes any harm.

What the new prohibition means is that vapers will turn to smoking cigarettes for their nicotine hits. They will turn from a relatively harmless method of consuming nicotine to a far more lethal form and the Commonwealth will be the beneficiary.

Why does the government with the public health industry, including the Australian Medical Association cheering them on, support the banning of nicotine for vaping if one of the clear outcomes will be a hike in cigarette smoking?

The only vaguely rational argument is that nicotine-based vaping or e-cigarettes might be a gateway to smoking, rather than the other way around. There is no evidence to support this. None whatsoever.

Indeed, what we can see is that the 15-24 age demographic has shunned smoking while many choose to vape. Vaping tends to be a young person’s caper. There’s no statistical evidence to indicate that by the time they hit 25 or 30 or 40, they hurl their vaping pods or e-cigarettes in the bin and light up a Marlboro.

It is more a case of people spending their hard-earned on a simple pleasure that comes with a certain risk but they carry on based on that much ignored principle of public policy, informed choice.

Vapers in older age groups tend to do so to get off the coffin nails. What are they going to do as of next Wednesday? Well, we know what they are going to do. They’re going to continue to consume nicotine in the only way available in the Australian marketplace: smoking.

Trust me these people have tried all the methods for quitting. Cold turkey, patches, chewing gums, sprays, tablets. They will need to receive doses of nicotine and the easiest way to do that is to stroll into a supermarket and buy a pack of smokes at the counter.

While the public health industry, those people who frown on the community for spending their money in pursuing the lawful pleasures of smoking, drinking and gambling, are stuck in an ideological warp, it’s difficult to believe the government has any other motive than a smash and grab exercise.

This article was first published at The Australian on 26 June, 2020.

NB: Several hours after it was published and under pressure from Coalition backbenchers, Health Minister Greg Hunt announced the ban on nicotine fluids and e-cigarettes would be postponed for six months.

114 Comments

  • Linz says:

    Get well.

  • Dwight says:

    Friends, check out Jack’s column in the Oz today.

    My thoughts and prayers are with you my friend.

  • The Outsider says:

    Trump’s call that the reluctance of governors to reopen schools is a political move is rich in irony.

    I so hope that Trump loses in a landslide, so the Republicans can have a good, hard look at the type of man they enabled, and don’t repeat the mistake.

    Scarily, though, there’s an excellent chance that Trump will be reelected, despite his handling of the pandemic, economy (running a huge deficit), and racial tensions. In particular, the decision to defund the WHO in the middle of a pandemic is unconscionable.

    • Bella says:

      So yet another narcissistic nutjob will be running for POTUS.
      Come on down Kanye West! Seriously deranged stuff. 😨

    • John L says:

      Being a bit hard on the Republicans Outsider.
      The best the Democrats can come up with is a geriatric who may not even make it to the elections. Last election they came up with a person who had very questionable activities when she was Secretary of State
      Have a look behind the politics of the WHO and China’s influence on it. The chances of an objective enquiry into Corona is zilch.
      If China wants to control the WHO, they can stump up the $400 million that the US puts up – after all the US government is running a deficit and need to save money from somewhere.
      Under Trump, black unemployment was at an all time low – the racial tensions did not come from Trump.
      I would also look closely at the way the Democrats absolutely refused to accept the decision of the umpires (the voters) at the last election. Pelosi and her crowd have damaged US Democracy almost beyond repair.
      I would also look at the total bias in reporting of many media outlets.
      So but on a bi-partisan hat and simply state that both candidates are problematic and the whole of US politics needs a revamp.

    • Razor says:

      Firstly Trump isn’t really a Republican. Just ask the Bush clan. Secondly the economy has never seen better days under Trump. Look at the unemployment figure. Prior to COVID it was remarkable. This week it’s starting to go well again. Racial tensions have nothing to do with race yet plenty to do with Anarchists. The WHO are a joke and their reluctance to call out China and the virus early has done untold damage.

      I sincerely wish there was a better candidate than the dementia riddled Biden to run against Trump but there isn’t. So he needs to stay. Open your eye!

      • The Outsider says:

        John L/Razor,

        I’ve opened both eyes.

        The mainstream press is exactly that – it’s not the Liberal/Progressive press. If you think Breitbart/Fox are the duck’s nuts, there’s not much hope for you. CNN/MSN/WaPo/NYT etc are reporting the news, not making Trump do what he does.

        For everything weird that Biden’s said, think 10x for Trump. Surely you guys haven’t forgotten hurricane Sharpies, ingesting disinfectant/injecting ultraviolet light, 15 COVID cases getting down to zero etc – too many to mention.

        Trump’s economic trajectory just carried continued Obama administration trends. However, the national debt ballooned under Trump, so I’m surprised that you rationalists would support someone like Trump.

        Maybe the WHO need a shake-up. Having worked on UN project teams, I know that it’s difficult to progress things expeditiously sometimes, where the emphasis is often on process and appeasing minority members, rather than outputs. However, abandoning the WHO during a pandemic is wrong.

        • John L says:

          Given the choice between the two in November, if I was a voter in the I would be staying at home.
          You really think your list of media outlets report it as it is Outsider? – dream on – they are as biased as the others.
          At least Trump will keep the East Coast Progressives in their box for another 4 years.
          The key will be who Biden chooses a running mate.

  • John L says:

    Just read your article in the Oz Jack.

    I hope everything goes well for you.

  • John L says:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/health-53081022

    Yep! it is just the flu! Like hell it is!

  • Razor says:

    We have been kind enough to provide some guidance to NSW and Victoria on how to go about border closures and in the case of Victoria proper lockdowns. If you think the Police in Victoria are without blame you would be wrong. Ashton decided to retire in the middle of a pandemic. That in itself is an interesting decision and demonstrates how much he considered police should be involved . Retired and still serving Senior Victoria Police, the Victoria Police Union, Dan Andrews and some Senior Ministers have significant questions to answer. Get your sources working JTI there is a big story in this. Very big. Don’t wait for me to retire to have to tell you.

  • The Bow-Legged Swantoon says:

    So how is everyone feeling about being Melburnians?

    • Trivalve says:

      Oh FFS

    • John L says:

      I want Dan Andrews head on the proverbial plate along with a few others.
      This time the incompetent, union factional dominated useless Victorian Labor has affected me big time and as far as I am concerned it is the whole of the Labor movement who can answer for this debacle.
      Some reporter on the Age wrote that it was bad luck.
      Pigs!
      It was total and absolute incompetence driven by factional and bureaucratic infighting of a government lead by a person with absolutely no skills other than oratory.

  • John L says:

    Ah well – the containment of Covid was easy the first time around .
    The Chinese, who know a thing or to about suppressing this sucker although they only admit to one city and miniscule deaths, as soon as they got 35 cases in Beijing closed down a goodly part of this city.
    The thing is now pretty well everywhere in Melbourne and we can only hope that Andrews acted in time – otherwise it will not be pretty.

  • Carl on the Coast says:

    Regarding the nota bene at the foot of your article Jack, the question arises as to whether the eminently detailed contents in your article itself may have been instrumental in causing Minister Hunt to postpone his ban on vaping, or did he realise there may have been insufficient Victorian fainting couches to go around.

  • Not Finished Yet says:

    With all the poor sods locked up in their towers, they could do with a few Rapunzels. They do have my sympathy, but it is for the greater good. Until a week or so ago I thought we were still going to have our week at the snow this year. No chance now, unfortunately. I know it seems rather selfish, but on teh other hand a couple of bartenders will be missing our support.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

PASSWORD RESET

LOG IN